The
Appearances (continued)
A
Spiritual Body?
When Paul refers to the resurrection body as a
"spiritual body" he cannot be meaning
a body made out of spirit. That would be a contradiction
in terms, for a spirit is precisely the absence
of a body. The idea of seeing a non-physical body
is incoherent, since sight apprehends its object
by means of light waves reflected from it and
a non-physical body cannot reflect light waves.
Paul is not talking about the substance the body
is made of, but its orientation. When we say,
"The Bible is a spiritual book," or
"Betty is a spiritual person," we don't
mean that they are made out of spirit, but that
they are orientated toward the spiritual.
This is not to say that Paul teaches the resurrection
body is ordinary, the same as before. On the contrary,
he explicitly states that it's glorious, imperishable,
immortal, and powerful. It is transformed - but
not from physical to non-physical, rather from
perishable to imperishable in order to inhabit
a renewed creation!13
Virtually all New Testament scholars admit that
Paul did not teach immortality of the soul alone,
but this position is intelligible only if he also
taught a physical, bodily resurrection. A better
translation of the Greek term Paul uses for "spiritual
body" would be "supernatural body,"
since the term is used in contrast to a natural
body.
Anti-Gnostic
Argument?
Every appearance of Jesus in the gospels is physical.
Since the gospel appearance stories are widely
accepted as independent, this multiple attestation
provides strong support for the historical credibility
of a physical, bodily resurrection. This could
not have happened if all the appearances were
really only visions. And since for a Jew the term
"resurrection" meant the physical resurrection
of a dead man from a tomb, the early believers
must have understood the resurrection of Jesus
as physical. This means that the physicalism of
the gospel appearances was not likely a response
to the anti-physicalism of the Gnostics. It is
more likely that the Gnostics de-materialized
the gospels' material appearances, than the gospels
materialized non-physical Gnostic accounts.
The fact is both Paul and the gospels view the
resurrection body as both physical and transformed.
The resurrected Jesus ate, cooked, and invited
touch, but also displayed super human capabilities
in his ability to appear and disappear at will
without regard to spatial distances. It was not
a body made out of spirit, but a body that had
been transformed from mortal to immortal. Moreover,
the recognition of the risen Jesus prompted worship.
Both the women and disciples knew that this was
no mere resuscitation of a corpse. After all,
Lazarus' resuscitation had not evoked worship!14
Hallucinations?
Could the appearances have been hallucinations?
Very unlikely! Hallucinations usually happen to
one person at a time. But gatherings of two, seven,
11+, 12+, and more than 500 witnessed appearances
of the resurrected Jesus! Hallucinations usually
take place under very specific and favourable
circumstances. The appearances of Jesus were in
a variety of locations and circumstances. Hallucinations
involve an expectancy on the part of the person
hallucinating. The women went to the tomb to complete
the anointing of a dead body with spices.
Hallucinations can't exceed the content of the
mind. But the disciples were devastated, defeated
and discouraged after the crucifixion. Even though
Jesus had predicted both his death and resurrection,
they had never caught on. It was too radically
different from what they had been taught by the
rabbis from their youth. They had absolutely no
concept of a dying, much less rising Messiah.
Hallucinations don't eat fish or invite touch.
Jesus did both!
Furthermore, hallucinations never would have led
to the belief in a Jesus who rose physically
and bodily and besides, hallucinations cannot
account for the empty tomb.
Only Apparent Death?
Is it possible that Jesus never really died? New
Testament scholars have universally rejected this
theory for over 100 years because it is physically
impossible and religiously inadequate.
This apparent death theory is asking us to believe
that after Jesus' torturous beating with fists,
sticks and a Roman flagrum (a whip with pieces
of sharp rock and metal embedded in the leather)
that would have opened up his back so badly as
to have exposed his inner organs, after carrying
a wooden beam up a mountain on that back, after
being attached to a wooden cross with spikes through
the wrists and ankles, after hanging on that cross
for six hours, breathing only by pulling himself
up and down to relieve the asphyxiating pressure
on his diaphragm, after having professional Roman
executioners pronounce him dead and thrusting
a spear in his side to make absolutely sure, and
after being wrapped up in nearly 100 lbs. of linen
and spices and laid in a cold dark tomb, Jesus
never really died, woke up on Sunday morning
feeling great, nudged a 2-ton stone uphill, quietly
slipped past the guards, found where the disciples
were hiding and appeared to them as Lord of life
and conqueror of death.
Not only is this clearly physically impossible
but it is religiously inadequate. Even if he had
somehow survived, he would have appeared to them
not as Lord of life and conqueror of death, but
as someone in desperate need of medical attention!
This would never have evoked the worship of Jesus
as one who had risen triumphantly from the grave.
Theories like the apparent death and hallucination
theories do not provide a complete explanation
for the facts; they only attempt to explain one
small portion and require other speculations to
account for the rest. This is in contrast to the
resurrection hypothesis that explains all the
facts without distorting them, and therefore remains
the best explanation.
Thus, the evidence is that Jesus made multiple
appearances after his death.
CONTINUE:
The Origin of the Christian Movement